Hey! Are you confused to decide which one is better Siteground vs Bluehost because both are the most popular web hosting platform? In this article, I will discuss the major points that will help you choose better hosting as per your need.
Among the fierce competitors in the hosting space, let’s dig into the details of some key features offered by both the popular web hosting companies namely, Siteground and Bluehost, and dissect their performance stats to bring out the clear winner for you between the two.
Overview of Siteground and Bluehost:
- Bluehost is an American-based company while Siteground is an international name
- Bluehost and Siteground both use superior SSD technology for all their servers, proving themselves to be reliable and faster
- Bluehost offers a range of plans from dedicated hosting to VPS to managed WordPress hosting plans. Meanwhile, Siteground is also popular for its full-blown performance with budget shared hosting plans
- None of the two hosts throw any bandwidth limitations which is a breakthrough
- The two website hosts provide considerable protection and top-notch security against cyber-crimes.
Comparison of Features
- Both the hosts promise to deliver uptime closer to 99.99% but Bluehost lags in a few aspects because of its honest admittance that during severe problems it may take time to fix them up
- Bluehost offers free domain names while Siteground doesn’t
- Navigation is easy and user-friendly as far as the two web hosts are concerned. On the other hand, Bluehost supports an impressive feature like 1-click WordPress installation
- Bluehost doesn’t offer free site migrations but Siteground does, by providing a free WordPress migration plug-in
- The Blue flash feature in Bluehost is a special customer care feature that tips the scale and makes it stand out on a comparative basis
- SiteGround and Bluehost both feature 30 days money-back guarantee on their shared hosting plans while Siteground offers refund policy to only its new customers, and not on renewal plans for the existing ones.
Comparison in Service:
- The SiteGround and Bluehost both tend to offer a live chat channel, a ticketing channel, and a phone-in option for customer support purposes. The former host manages to pull off the waiting time hurdle whereas the latter disappoints you in the concerned matter, unfortunately.
- While Bluehost offers four Shared hosting plans, namely, Basic plan, Plus plan, Choice-plus plan and the Pro plan costing around $23/month, Siteground offers only three plans- StartUp, GrowBig, and GoGeek plan, costing $34.95/month. Therefore, Bluehost has an affordable pricing structure with more or less the same services as provided by the other.
Pros and Cons of Siteground:
|Provides its caching mechanism, Geeky SuperCacher.||Expensive hosting plans.|
|It offers faster website loading.||No built-in dedicated IP address.|
|Full protection from DDoS attacks.||It doesn’t offer any free domain name.|
|It offers free automatic backups daily.||It offers expensive renewal plans.|
|It provides an uptime guarantee.||Average DIY focused support.|
Pros and Cons of Bluehost:
|Offers free domain name and free SSL Certificates on sign-up.||It doesn’t offer an uptime guarantee.|
|It provides an excellent user-friendly interface.||Free daily backup is not guaranteed with all the plans offered by Bluehost.|
|Provides free in-built DDoS protection.||It does not possess an in-house cache system.|
|Seamless integration with WordPress and other content management websites.||No option for auto-updates.|
|Great customer support through 24/7 all-round live chat, tickets, phones and social media||No data centers for this host are disclosed.|
Comparative Study of Siteground vs Bluehost:
After throwing light on the features and services provided by these two popular web hosting companies, we will incline our attention to the comparative corner to bring the best out of the two.
- Siteground hosts over 500,000 domains and Bluehost serves a wide range of over two million domains.
- Siteground is highly responsive but expensive and comes with more interesting hosting features whereas Bluehost offers great storage and lower prices. However, the latter disappoints with its weak performance
- Both the hosting providers offer cPanel-based solutions but the approach of Siteground is clear and, a bit salesy in the context of Bluehost.
- Though Siteground uses SSD as their storage drives which are quicker but costly, Bluetooth already offers great storage with all their plans
- Siteground wins over to be a lifesaver with reliable backup features while with Bluehost, you need to buy their premium backup service
- Both the website hosting providers offer SSH access system while Git repository is unavailable with the shared hosting of Bluehost but Siteground.
Which web hosting solution is better
- An automatic system update is absent in Bluehost but is available with Siteground.
- Siteground offers automatic plug-in updates while Bluehost lags this feature.
- Bluehost appears to be more strong in the context of storage.
- The in-house caching system is available with Siteground but Bluehost needs to install a plug-in for the same.
- Uptime, being the critical performance metric, is much impressive as offered by Siteground hosts compared to the Bluehost.
- Siteground provides a staging area to try out the code changes without affecting the production site while Bluehost does not.
- There are four data center locations for Siteground and only one for Bluehost.
- Siteground offers free migration for one website while Bluehost does not even support any such feature.
- SiteGround offers 24-hour satisfactory customer support via phone, email and live chat and Bluehost is considerably slow at the response.
Reviewing all such features offered by each of the two providers, we declare Siteground to be the clear winner in terms of performance, services, response, and many more advanced hosting features for you to trust and rely on.